Download Article

Second quarter results from the energy survey showed that Tenth District energy activity increased moderately, while expectations cooled from last quarter but remained expansionary. Firms reported that oil prices needed to be on average $66 per barrel for drilling to be profitable, and $83 per barrel for a substantial increase in drilling to occur. Natural gas prices needed to be $3.61 per million Btu for drilling to be profitable on average, and $4.53 per million Btu for drilling to increase substantially.

Summary of Quarterly Indicators

Tenth District energy activity increased moderately in the second quarter of 2026, as indicated by firms contacted between June 15, 2026, and June 30, 2026 (Tables 1 & 2). The quarter-over-quarter drilling and business activity index was 18 in Q2, up from 0 in Q1 and from -39 in Q4 (Chart 1). All quarter-over-quarter indexes posted positive readings, with the revenues and profits indexes increasing further to multi-year highs. Employment and access to credit increased as well, to 13 and 15 respectively.

Drilling activity grew somewhat from this time last year, with the year-over-year drilling/business activity index rising from 0 to 9 in Q2, its first positive reading since Q1 2023. All year-over-year indexes increased and posted positive readings. Capital expenditures increased from -9 to 15 amid higher oil prices.

Six-month expectations cooled from last quarter but remained expansionary. The drilling activity, revenues, profits, and capital expenditures indexes all eased from elevated readings as 73% of firms expected oil prices to decline in the next six months. The drilling activity index cooled from 25 to 12; however expected employment growth accelerated from a reading of 6 to 15. The average firm expects WTI oil to be $75/barrel in the next six months, below the $83/barrel price the average firm reports needing to support a substantial increase in drilling.

Chart 1. Drilling/Business Activity Indexes

Skip to data visualization table
Chart 1 is a time series of the drilling/business activity index versus a quarter ago and versus a year ago from the second quarter of 2022 to the second quarter of 2026. Quarterly drilling and business activity index increased from 0 to 18.
Quarter Vs. a Quarter Ago Vs. a Year Ago
Q2 22 57 77
Q3 22 44 78
Q4 22 6 56
Q1 23 -13 17
Q2 23 -19 -16
Q3 23 -13 -23
Q4 23 -33 -33
Q1 24 -13 -26
Q2 24 -14 -25
Q3 24 -13 -29
Q4 24 -13 -16
Q1 25 6 -18
Q2 25 -17 -17
Q3 25 -16 -24
Q4 25 -39 -50
Q1 26 0 0
Q2 26 18 9

Summary of Special Questions

Firms were asked what oil and natural gas prices were needed on average for drilling to be profitable across the fields in which they are active. The average oil price needed was $66 per barrel (Chart 2), while the average natural gas price needed was $3.61 per million Btu (Chart 3). Firms were also asked what prices were needed for a substantial increase in drilling to occur across the fields in which they are active. The average oil price needed was $83 per barrel (Chart 2), and the average natural gas price needed was $4.53 per million Btu (Chart 3).

Firms reported what they expected oil and natural gas prices to be in six months, one year, two years, and five years. The average expected WTI prices were $75, $72, $73, and $80 per barrel, respectively. The average expected Henry Hub natural gas prices were $3.38, $3.53, $3.90, and $4.47 per million Btu, respectively. Firms were asked how certain constraints might hinder business activity in the next 12 months. Just over half of firms reported that labor and/or supply chain issues might constrain activity slightly, while another 15% (6%) reported the supply chain (labor) could constrain activity significantly. Nearly half of firms reported financing conditions would have no impact on activity, while 36% expect them to slightly constrain activity and another 15% expect them to significantly constrain activity. Additionally, a quarter of firms expected regulatory policy to have no impact, while 31% expected a slight constraint and 44% expected a significant constraint.

Contacts were also asked how capital expenditures plans changed from the beginning of the year. Over half of firms (53%) reported no change in their planned capital expenditures, while 32% increased their plans for the remainder of the year and another 6% increased them significantly. Only 9% of contacts reported lowering planned capital expenditures.

Firms were asked what oil prices were needed on average for drilling to be profitable and for a substantial increase to occur across the fields in which they are active, as well as their price expectations in six months, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years. Chart 2 shows the average oil prices and ranges that firms reported.

Firms were asked what natural gas prices were needed on average for drilling to be profitable and for a substantial increase to occur across the fields in which they are active, as well as their price expectations in six months, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years. Chart 3 shows the average natural gas prices and ranges that firms reported.

Chart 4. Special Question: To what extent might the following constraints hinder your firm's business activity in the next 12 months?

Skip to data visualization table
Chart 4 is a bar chart showing the percent of firms which reported policy/regulations, labor, physical capital, and financial capital as significant constraints or slight constraints to business activity in the next 12 months.
Category Significant Constraint Slight Constraint No Impact
Labor 6 55 39
Equipment, Supply Chain, or Physical Capital Availability 15 52 33
Financing Conditions or Financial Capital Availability 15 36 49
Policy/Regulatory 44 31 25

Chart 5. Special Question: Compared to the beginning of the year, how have your planned capital expenditures changed for the remainder of 2026?

Skip to data visualization table
Chart 5 is a bar chart showing the percent of firms which reported significantly lower, lower, unchanged, higher, or significantly higher capital expenditures plans compared to the beginning of the year.
Category Percent
Significantly Lower 3
Lower 6
No Change 53
Higher 32
Significantly Higher 6

Selected Energy Comments

“Spending will continue to be conservative due to commodity price volatility that is expected due to geopolitical conflict, especially in the Mideast.”

“Uncertain price environment is causing our drilling customers to take a ‘wait and see’ approach.”

“Crude oil price reaction has not been anticipated. There is still a possibility of higher crude oil prices once SPR release has ceased.”

“Current futures environment shows that the market expects a quick recovery. Futures prices less than 2 years forward are not significantly changed in spite of shortages in parts of the world.”

“We expect a balanced market over the next several years.”

“Current efforts to open the Strait of Hormuz and releasing sanctions on Iran oil sales will place downward pressure on oil prices.”

“Stabilizing oil prices post Iran War.”

“US storage levels are very low. Higher prices aren't causing demand destruction but rather demand curtailment.”

“Demand increasing moderately and smooth post war recovery.”

“There is a disconnect between the tight physical market and the perceived looseness of the Strait of Hormuz opening. We believe it will be hard to replace the 1.5 billion barrel loss of crude without some higher pricing to displace demand.”

“Once the oil market rebalances there appears there will be a modest over supply of crude oil. Longer term $75 is an amount that works for the full cycle return of the oil business but not too high for consumers.”

“High domestic production will continue to place downward pressure on gas prices.”

“Ultimately, the US has substantial gas reserves that are stuck in the US. Without additional LNG permitting and exporting, the Henry Hub price will remain dislocated from TTF and JKM.”

Additional Resources

Current Release
Download Historical Data
About the Energy Survey

The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the positions of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City or the Federal Reserve System.

Authors

Cortney Cowley

Assistant Vice President and Oklahoma City Branch Executive

Cortney Cowley serves as Oklahoma City Branch Executive and Assistant Vice President for the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. Cowley joined the Bank in 2015 as an economist …

Read Bio

Megan Williams

Associate Economist and Senior Manager

Megan Williams is Associate Economist and Senior Manager in the Regional Affairs department at the Kansas City Fed’s Oklahoma City Branch office. In this role, she is responsibl…

Read Bio