Payments Crises and ConsequencesSeptember 3, 2020
Payment system shutdowns during contractions can scar economies. In the previous 40 years, state governors temporarily suspended payments from state-insured financial institutions four times. Suspensions in Nebraska (1983), Ohio (1985), and Maryland (1985) occurred during expansions and had little measurable effects on macroeconomic aggregates. Rhode Island’s suspension (1991) occurred during a recession and lengthened and deepened the downturn. Unemployment increased. Output declined, possible permanently relative to what might have been. We document these effects using a novel Bayesian approach that characterizes the key types of uncertainty in estimating and interpreting counterfactual and synthetic controls. Our findings suggest that policies ensuring that banks continue to process payments during contractions—including the 2008 bailouts of financial institutions and the unprecedented support of the financial system during the COVID-19 crisis—have substantial value.
- Chen, Qian, Christoffer Koch, Gary Richardson, and Padma Sharma. 2020. “Payments Crises and Consequences.” Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Research Working Paper no. 20-10, September. Available at https://doi.org/10.18651/RWP2020-10