Workers’ Compensation and State Employment Growth
 

  Kelly D. Edmiston
Senior Economist                                                                                       
Community Affairs Department
Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City
925 Grand Boulevard
Kansas City, MO 64198-0001
Tel: (816) 881-2004 or (800) 333-1010 ext. 2004
Fax: (816) 881-2704
E-Mail: kelly.edmiston@kc.frb.org

January, 2005 (Revised)

 

  Abstract

Workers’ Compensation reforms have been on the table in virtually every state over the last several years, and many states have launched comprehensive reforms.  At least nine states undertook major reforms of their workers’ compensation systems in 2004 alone, and the reforms were driven largely by claims that higher workers’ compensation costs are driving away businesses and the employment that comes with them.  Given the nearly universal assertion by promoters of workers’ compensation reforms that high cost states lose jobs to relatively low cost states, one would expect that substantial research exists to back up the claims.  In fact, however, although a voluminous literature exists that explores behavioral aspects of workers’ compensation insurance, including effects on injury rates, number of claims, and duration of claims, there has been no systematic study of the relationship between workers’ compensation costs and economic growth.  This paper sets out to help fill the intellectual void by examining the relationship between workers’ compensation costs and employment growth across U.S. states from 1976 – 2000.   Workers’ compensation costs are found to have a statistically significant negative impact on employment and wages, but the elasticities are very small, suggesting that workers’ compensation costs are not a likely cause of jobs woes in most states.

 

JEL: R11, R48

 

 
Return to Working Papers