1x1clear.gif (43 bytes)
How Does Labor Mobility Affect Income Convergence? 
Jordan Rappaport 
February 2000 
Last Revised: May 2000 
RWP 99-12 
Research Division 
Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City 

    Abstract
The neoclassical growth model is extended to allow for mobile labor. Following a negative shock to a small economy's capital stock, capital and labor frictions effect an equilibrium transition path during which wages remain below their steady-state level. Outmigration directly contributes to faster income convergence but also creates a disincentive for gross capital formation. The net result is that across a wide range of calibrations, the speed of income convergence is relatively insensitive to the degree of labor mobility. 

Jordan Rappaport is an economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. The author would like to thank Alberto Alesina, Larry Ball, Robert Barro, Chris Foote, Ed Glaeser, Matt Kahn, David Laibson, Philip Lane, John McHale, Jong-Wha Lee, Dani Rodrik, Jeff Sachs, David
Weil and seminar participants at the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, the 1999 Federal Reserve System Regional Meeting, Harvard University, Brown University, and the University of Maryland for advice and feedback. He would also like to thank the Center for International
Development at Harvard University and the National Science Foundation for financial support. The views expressed in this paper are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City or the Federal Reserve System. 

Jordan e-mail: jordan.m.rappaport@kc.frb.org
Back to top              RWP home